Re: Final Solution of the Aquatic Question



Andrew Nowicki wrote:

> The otter's den known as a 'holt' is another
> reason it could not compete against bipedal
> hominids in small, clear streams. There is
> not enough food in the vicinity of the den
> to feed a family of otters. Nomadic hominids
> were bigger than the otters and probably able
> to defend themselves with sticks or stones,
> so they were less vulnerable to predation.

Otters are quick, stealthy, fierce, and incredibly
good swimmers. Their relatively small body size and
small group size allows them to survive on the
relative scarce resources associated with freshwater
streams and rivers. The supposition that early
hominids had any of the traits/behaviors necessary to
directly compete with them indicates brain damage on
the part of anybody that would suggest such siliness.

> Nomadic hominids were also better suited to
> carry their babies around. It is unlikely that
> the first nomadic, wading hominids slept in
> secure shelters made of tree branches.

Andrew, my advice is for you to get in touch with a
local chapter of Glue Sniffers Anonymous as soon as
possible.

Jim

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Final Solution of the Aquatic Question
    ... "The australopiths and ancestors of gorillas and chimpanzees ... between the coastal habitats and the clear stream habitats ... of primitive hominids. ... but never mention the streams. ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: Lucy = slow
    ... could compete with all other species, ... hominids maintained a competitive edge over their ... have no reason to assume that anyone ... over every other species. ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)