Re: Final Solution of the Aquatic Ocean
- From: "Marc Verhaegen" <fa204466@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 00:50:35 +0200
"spiznet" <mark@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1124192947.195115.263760@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Marc Verhaegen wrote:
>
> > Again:
> > AAT is about *Homo*, ie, Homo after the H/P split.
> > AAT is *not* about apiths.
> > AAT is *not* about apes.
> > Repeat: AAT is about Homo.
> > Okidoki?
> > Finally understood?
> > About Homo.
> >
> > Again: this is AAT:
> >
> TAKE THIS OUT, there is no HOMO for 1.5 my yet, imaginary get it:
AAT=Homo:
After Pan & Homo split, we had Homo & we had Pan. Okidoki?
AAT is *not* about fossils.
AAT is about human ancestors after the H/P split.
> > AAT says that some time after the Homo-Pan split 7-4 Ma, our ancestors
were
> > seaside omnivores who collected coconuts, fruits, bird eggs, turtles,
> > shell-, crayfish, algae... The theory (based on the behavior, anatomy &
> > physiology of living humans compared to other animals) explains many
> > typically Homo traits (not seen in apes or australopiths) a lot better
than
> > dry savanna scenarios do: brain size, diving skills, breathing control,
> > vocality, small mouth & chewing muscles, tongue bone descent, longer
airway,
> > projecting nose, reduced sense of smell, handiness, tool use, late
puberty,
> > long legs, body alignment, reduced climbing, fatness, fur loss, high
needs
> > of water, sodium, iodine & poly-unsaturated fatty acids...
> START HERE IF YOU WANT ANY CREDIBILITY:
Don't be ridiculous: you omit the essential part.
> > In the fossil & archeological record, this waterside
episode
> > is reflected in the Plio-Pleistocene dispersals of Homo along the Indian
> > Ocean & African coasts: 1.8-Ma Homo remains come from Algeria, Iran,
Kenya,
> > Georgia, Java... always near lakes or seas (R.Dennell 2003 JHE 45:421);
in
> > spite of sea level changes (Ice Ages), Homo much more than australopith
> > remains have been found amid shells, corals & barnacles, from 1.8 to 0.1
Ma
> > (throughout the Pleistocene), in coasts all over the Old World
(Mojokerto,
> > Terra Amata, Table Bay, Eritrea...), even on islands that could only be
> > reached by sea (Flores 0.8 Ma
> > http://allserv.rug.ac.be/~mvaneech/outthere.htm).
> > Marc Verhaegen
> First, it is obvious your AAT is not just about Homo.
Don't be ridiculous: AAT is about Homo.
> Second, who are you, a Yahoo list owner, to decide what is and isn't AAT.
Don't be ridiculous: AAT = the theory that says that the differences
between H & P show that our ancestors were more aquatic in the past.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Final Solution of the Aquatic Ocean
- From: spiznet
- Re: Final Solution of the Aquatic Ocean
- References:
- Re: Final Solution of the Aquatic Question
- From: Rich Travsky
- Re: Final Solution of the Aquatic Question
- From: Marc Verhaegen
- Re: Final Solution of the Aquatic Ocean
- From: spiznet
- Re: Final Solution of the Aquatic Question
- Prev by Date: Re: Final Solution of the Aquatic Question
- Next by Date: apiths & AAT (Re: Final Solution of the Aquatic Question
- Previous by thread: Re: Final Solution of the Aquatic Ocean
- Next by thread: Re: Final Solution of the Aquatic Ocean
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|