Re: erectus (or their immediate ancestors) were parttime divers? (Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
- From: "Marc Verhaegen" <fa204466@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 09:45:18 +0200
"Rich Travsky" <" traRvEsky"@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:43016DA0.2C33740@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > I thought Marc had given up on this angle.
> > If you can give me a good argument... :-D
> Didn't you read Rick's post?
Are you really too stupid to understand what a hypothesis is? I'm not even
saying my hypothesis is correct, I'm only waiting for 1 single little
argument against my hypothesis. So far, you have shown nothing by empty
blabla.
.
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: erectus (or their immediate ancestors) were parttime divers? (Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
- Next by Date: Re: Bo Graslund "Early humans & their world" Routledge
- Previous by thread: Re: erectus (or their immediate ancestors) were parttime divers? (Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
- Next by thread: Re: erectus (or their immediate ancestors) were parttime divers? (Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
