Re: Is the Savannah Theory really dead yet?
- From: "rmacfarl" <rmacfarl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 18 Aug 2005 17:33:17 -0700
mclark wrote:
> "JAE" <jae@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:1124237600.058152.230780@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> [...]
>
> > Now you further don't impress me
> > with having any real interest in learning anything, but simply want to
> > rake much. Goodbye, schmuck.
>
> Oh, BTW ***, earlier you were casting about for a
> definition of the word <plonk>. I can't believe you're
> that stupid but if you are, the above "Goodbye, schmuck"
> would be it.
>
> Don't worry Bucky, I'll always be here for you....
A while back, I wrote:
"
....
Algis won't like my criticisms, and I don't propose to engage yet
again in a game of claim and counter-claim with him over them, because
I and others have done it before, and it is ultimately futile trying
to engage in dialogue with a closed mind. Perhaps that is not the same
with Richard01. We'll see...
"
We've seen.
I'll leave it to you to explain what plonk means Mclark...
Ross Macfarlane
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is the Savannah Theory really dead yet?
- From: Jois
- Re: Is the Savannah Theory really dead yet?
- References:
- Is the Savannah Theory really dead yet?
- From: richardparker01
- Re: Is the Savannah Theory really dead yet?
- From: jois
- Re: Is the Savannah Theory really dead yet?
- From: richardparker01
- Re: Is the Savannah Theory really dead yet?
- From: JAE
- Re: Is the Savannah Theory really dead yet?
- From: mclark
- Is the Savannah Theory really dead yet?
- Prev by Date: Re: Mediterranean Genesis
- Next by Date: Re: Mediterranean Genesis
- Previous by thread: Re: Is the Savannah Theory really dead yet?
- Next by thread: Re: Is the Savannah Theory really dead yet?
- Index(es):