Re: Algis ranting about AAH


"Marc Verhaegen" <fa204466@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4307194d$0$345$ba620e4c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "JAE" <jae@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:1124488751.733008.185170@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>> Lee Olsen did a rather good job of pointing out the holes to you within
> the last couple of weeks. Your response was to duck and claim that your
> "theory" wasn't about fossils. IOW (as you're so fond of saying) you've
> got
> a "theory" that exists only by ignoring contradictory evidence and doesn't
> actually explain anything.
>
> Are you rally so stupid or only pretending? Just show me, my boy, how
> "fossils" contradict our theory. They don't.
>
> Don't duck, but answer:
>
Dirt simple. The fossil evidence of early hominds
is positive evidence for occupation of inland, woodland
to open savannah environments. End of story. Saying
this does not 'contradict' hominids living elsewhere
only indicates you have mastered one of the great
logical fallacies. You can't prove a negative so its
no use asking. What you need to do is get positive
evidence for coastal, Indian Ocean hominds. Your
inability to understand this basic point is what will
forever confine you to the lunatic fringe.

Rick Wagler


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Making money from Java
    ... >> rather than to a Biblical flood exposing people to radiation. ... > covered and protected the earth, and that this covering was destroyed at the ... >> geological processes are insufficient to have swept that evidence away. ... >>> Fossils don't form under normal circumstances. ...
    (comp.lang.cobol)
  • Re: Tweedys Turkana Boy
    ... I thought you were a Gestaltist who knew everything about evolution. ... Dana NEVER posted an argument about Turkana. ... claim or argument EXCEPT to say that it represented evidence of human ... Neither of those assumptions are required to see that many fossils ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Answering Friar Broccoli
    ... Why, if you think this way, are you forced to reject evolution? ... care for simple statements with no evidence to back it up. ... small-brained as ancestral to modern humans. ... fossils rather than the relatively few I have seen. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: The most serious defect in the evolutionary theory is the absence of transitional fossils.
    ... > Bobby Bryant intentionally acts like the total lack of transitionals is ... However there is not a lack of transitional fossils. ... Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. ... > everything about Darwinists you need to know: ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript.
    ... >>> ....so when you say 4 Ma I'm confused as to your definition of Homo. ... Fossils that no doubt belong to Homo are ... >> it's usu.useless to try to find ancestors in fossils. ... > Homo-like activities is larger than the first arguable evidence (ie, ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)