Re: Why You May Never Comprehend Human Evolution


JAE wrote:
> Jim McGinn wrote:
>
>
> > Talking to anthropologists about evolutionary
> > theory is like talking to your dog about auto
> > mechanics. For me to have asked Ross to explain
> > why he thinks Dawkins supposedly put forth some
> > kind of selfish gene theory is like asking your
> > dog whether he thinks your car needs a tune-up.
> > Predictably, I got no response from Ross.
>
> Listening to you spout about evolutionary theory is like listening to a
> street psychotic spout about evolutionary theory.
>
> Put up or shut up. You think your stuff is so frickin' brilliant?
> Then get it published and stop deluding yourself that your ideas are
> going to catch on because you posted them in a news group once upon a
> time and followed up by promoting them by calling yourself a genius.
> It appears from my vantage that you're a self-deluded nut-case who can
> convince himself that he's brilliant only with the assumption that
> everyone else must be only marginally smart enough to stop drooling on
> the floor.

It's funny how you've been pretending that you
haven't read it so that you can can hide your
inability to dispute it. Do you think it's not
obvious to all that this is the case? Do you
think nobody will notice that your dispute of
my hypothesis is 100% ad hominen and politics
and zero percent content oriented? Surely you'd
think that if I was psychotic that there'd be at
least one fact based problem with the highly
detailed hypothesis that I presented. But all
we see from you are futile attempts to turn back
the clock and pretend that you never read it and
desperate pleadings--"primary literature"--to
excuse the fact that you can't dispute it.

> Why again is it that you haven't bothered to publish your manifesto?

Because of the dismissive attitude that you epitomize.

Jim

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Why You May Never Comprehend Human Evolution
    ... For me to have asked Ross to explain why he thinks Dawkins supposedly put forth some kind of selfish gene theory is like asking your dog whether he thinks your car needs a tune-up. ... inability to dispute it. ... detailed hypothesis that I presented. ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: Jasons Dilemma
    ... >> Jim McGinn wrote: ... delusional-schmuck, er uh, Jimmy. ... complete enough to dispute in full form or to really bother with at ... but the fractions that squeak through in your various diatribes ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: Impeccable
    ... >> Jim McGinn wrote: ... >> not the genius that you claim to be. ... > up my solution to human evolution as evidence that supports this ... It would seem, then, that the best way to dispute my, to use ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: Jasons Dilemma
    ... >> Jim McGinn wrote: ... >>> IOW, Jason, herein you've produced an incredibly lame ... >>> excuse for pretending to ignore my hypothesis. ... bothers to try to dispute your hypothesis is that it appears largely ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: Savanna nonsense
    ... >> Jim McGinn wrote: ... >>> You're the idiot to make climatic assumptions based on location alone. ... > fossil record upwards of 7 million years ago. ... You don't provide enough to dispute, ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
Loading