Re: skinny runners
- From: "JAE" <jae@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 7 Sep 2005 15:51:13 -0700
Lee, you're arguing with someone singularly immune to reason. You're
arguing with someone whose reasoning resembles that found in
psychiatric lockdown. Marc will continue to insist that you prove a
negative, will continue to insist that he has "comparative evidence"
that "proves" his position and that you've still not got "one arguement
against" it. No appeals to reason (e.g. asking him to explain and
defend this supposed comparative evidence, confronting him with the
fact that his defense is a request to prove a negative, providing
several arguments against the superbly nebulous 'scenario' he's
supposedly advocating) will ever change this. I suspect you know this
and I suspect you're just having fun at his expense or hope to at least
dissuade those seemingly susceptible to his contagious illogic, but
just in case you actually thought Marc could change his mind, he can't
or won't.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: skinny runners
- From: Lee Olsen
- Re: skinny runners
- References:
- Re: skinny runners
- From: Rich Travsky
- Re: skinny runners
- From: Marc Verhaegen
- Re: skinny runners
- From: Lee Olsen
- Re: skinny runners
- From: Marc Verhaegen
- Re: skinny runners
- From: Lee Olsen
- Re: skinny runners
- Prev by Date: Re: olfaction (Re: skinny runners
- Next by Date: Re: skinny runners
- Previous by thread: Re: skinny runners
- Next by thread: Re: skinny runners
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|