Re: skinny runners
- From: "Lee Olsen" <paleocity@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 7 Sep 2005 16:19:37 -0700
JAE wrote:
> Lee, you're arguing with someone singularly immune to reason. You're
> arguing with someone whose reasoning resembles that found in
> psychiatric lockdown. Marc will continue to insist that you prove a
> negative, will continue to insist that he has "comparative evidence"
> that "proves" his position and that you've still not got "one arguement
> against" it. No appeals to reason (e.g. asking him to explain and
> defend this supposed comparative evidence, confronting him with the
> fact that his defense is a request to prove a negative, providing
> several arguments against the superbly nebulous 'scenario' he's
> supposedly advocating) will ever change this. I suspect you know this
> and I suspect you're just having fun at his expense or hope to at least
> dissuade those seemingly susceptible to his contagious illogic, but
> just in case you actually thought Marc could change his mind, he can't
> or won't.
And Algis? :-)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: skinny runners
- From: mclark
- Re: skinny runners
- From: JAE
- Re: skinny runners
- References:
- Re: skinny runners
- From: Rich Travsky
- Re: skinny runners
- From: Marc Verhaegen
- Re: skinny runners
- From: Lee Olsen
- Re: skinny runners
- From: Marc Verhaegen
- Re: skinny runners
- From: Lee Olsen
- Re: skinny runners
- From: JAE
- Re: skinny runners
- Prev by Date: Re: Bo Graslund "Early humans & their world" Routledge
- Next by Date: Re: skinny runners
- Previous by thread: Re: skinny runners
- Next by thread: Re: skinny runners
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|