Re: Homo & molluscs




Marc Verhaegen wrote:
> "deowll" <deowll@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:Tl3Ue.24138$ZL4.22912@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > "Lee Olsen" <paleocity@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:1126192656.550222.226600@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Marc Verhaegen wrote:
> > > "Lee Olsen" <paleocity@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > > news:1126031804.605042.206150@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Marc Verhaegen wrote:
> > > > "Lee Olsen" <paleocity@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > > > news:1125885357.965665.70700@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > Marc Verhaegen wrote:
> > > > > > "deowll" <deowll@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > > > > > news:4RkSe.7105$e47.6641@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > "Jim McGinn" <jimmcginn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > > > > > > news:1125731530.718164.185070@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Marc Verhaegen wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > So? Any reason why you think these animals could not have
> lived
> > > > next to
> > > > > > > > "The sediments, numerous molluscan shells (Gyraulus
> chihliensis
> > > and
> > > > > > > > Planorbis youngi), and leaves and fruits of aquatic plants
> (for
> > > > example
> > > > > > > > Trapa sp.) in MJG-III indicate a low-energy lakeshore or marsh
> > > > > > environment
> > > > > > > > rich in organic materials."?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > No reason at all Marc. Any reason that these highly
> > > > > > > mobile creatures might have lived at considerable
> > > > > > > distance from, "The sediments, numerous molluscan
> > > > > > > shells (Gyraulus chihliensis and Planorbis youngi),
> > > > > > > and leaves and fruits of aquatic plants."?
> > > > > > > Any reason at all?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > "Shallow water" the Nature report says. Yes, modern
> > > > > > > > > Hadza set up their hunting blinds near shallow water,
> > > > > > > > > but NEVER where they live. Their base camps are
> > > > > > > > > found 1-2 km away (O'Connell et all. 2002:850).
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Fine. And? Your point? We all know how modern Hadza live, but
> > > we're
> > > > > > > > talking
> > > > > > > > here about our ancestors 1, 2, 3... Ma. Anything in the
> Hazda's
> > > > > > lifestyle
> > > > > > > > that contradicts our scenario?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Uh, Yes, as Lee stated above, modern Hadza set up
> > > > > > > their hunting blinds near shallow water, but NEVER
> > > > > > > where they live. Their base camps are found 1-2 km
> > > > > > > away (O'Connell et all. 2002:850).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > So? Your point??
> > > > >
> > > > > No swimming allowed.
> > > >
> > > > And?? contradicts our scenario??
> > >
> > > Pretty obvious isn't it?
> > >
> > > H/G set up hunting blinds near water sources because they know that
> > > is the best place to hunt game. Do you think they are hunting human
> > > swimmers at these locations?
> > >
> > > :-D
> > >
> > > Why on earth would hunters lose their fur??
> >
> >
> > Inform a bit. If you want me to answer that, you are going to have to
> > tell me exactly when it was Homo lost the fur.
>
> Why on earth should I have to tell when exactly??

If you can't say when, then you certainly don't what the reason was.


>
> No, no. Try to follow a bit. Not difficult.
> Humans less fur than chimps.

Chimps have been on the savanna for millions of years less time than
Homo, who is a better adapted animal for hot arid climates.


> Why?

Can a chimp outrun a horse in a long-distance race with his heavy fur
coat? Of course not.


> Why other mammals less fur than others?


Care to try that again?



> Why you believe humans = exception??


Easy, because we can out run a horse in the desert. Proof is in the
pudding, no matter what your flawed-comparative data tells you.



>
>
>
> >
> >
> >
> > got smaller teeth??
> >
> >
> > Why is the trend still going on now? The entire Hss species still
> > diving for canned tuna?
> >
> >
> > get thick
> > > fat layers??
> >
> > Not so much fat that we can't run down a horse that gets his fatless
> > body and fur all lathered up running long distance over the heat of the
> > savanna. Did you say savanna animals (runners) don't have fat? That's
> > why we win.
> >
> >
> >
> > run on 2 instread of 4 legs??
> >
> >
> > Ask the horse, he lost the race.
> >
> >
> > reduced olfaction??
> >
> > No need for good smell, when you can see your prey 10 miles away.
> > etc.etc.
> >
> > You need neural tissue to process the data and you need sensors in the
> nose.
> > Part of this may have been selected out for real reasons. In other cases
> it
> > doesn't seem to have been vital. We do have good vision and human trackers
> > from primitive societies are appallingly good.
> >
> > As one modern day dude trained in the old time methods said, If there are
> > deer around I can locate them because they have to move to feed and drink
> > and they can't avoid leaving traces. If I wanted to I could kill all of
> them
> > in a given locality using a bow and arrow. No exceptions and not a serious
> > challenge. The guy doesn't even hunt because he said it wasn't fun because
> > it was too easy. His trainers challenge to be a master/man was to kill a
> > deer with a knife. He did pass when younger.
> >
> >
> > etc.etc.
> > > Do you really fail to see the connection??
> >
> >
> >
> > Do you have any evidence at all to support the aquatic theory?
> >
> >
> > > Again, in very simple words:
> > > - our ancestors = waterside
> >
> >
> > This idea suffers from total lack of evidence;
>
>


Since you can't demonstrate any of the below in tests, it really isn't
worth much to science.

> AAT s.s. (based on the behavior, anatomy, physiology & DNA of living humans
> compared to other animals) says that sea/lake-side ancestors collected
> coconuts, fruits, bird eggs, turtles, shell-, crayfish, algae etc. This
> explains unique Homo traits (not seen in apes or apiths) better than plains-
> or forest-dwelling scenarios do: brain size, diving skills, breathing
> control, vocality, small mouth & chewing muscles, tongue bone descent,
> longer airway, projecting nose, poor sense of smell, handiness, tool use,
> late puberty, long legs, aligned body, poor climbing, fatness, fur loss,
> high needs of water, sodium, iodine & poly-unsaturated fatty acids etc.

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Sweating hominids
    ... This is another hint that heat loss in water is ... a serious problem for warm-blooded animals. ... Fur is hydrophilic meaning that it attracts ... that why it's not very sensible to think that humans (with SC fat about ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: OT Question for horse people
    ... if a horse truly belongs to you, ... i hope that helps with the horse dilema,am,ma ... measure fur measure! ... Prev by Date: ...
    (rec.pets.dogs.behavior)
  • Re: Sweating hominids
    ... >> c) SC fat layers in mammals are only seen in animals that come frequently ... >> in contact with wet soil or water. ... If the fur is much longer that about 1 mm, ... >>> Note that female mosquito probes your skin before she plunges her ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: open letter to the Google company, on the value of the scientific groups
    ... of animal fur. ... for the traditional etymology of bear as the brown one. ... mongooses in India and beavers elsewhere got their name because they're ... of animals for the first time, they name the new animals with ...
    (sci.lang)
  • "And they skin these cats while theyre still alive."
    ... Journalists fail to press celebrities about outlandish claims ... I'm just amazed at the free pass journalists sometimes give to ... Ethical Treatment of Animals) supporter Paul McCartney, ... Real fur is a renewable resource, ...
    (rec.music.beatles)