Re: skinny runners
- From: Rich Travsky <" traRvEsky"@hotmMOVEail.com>
- Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 22:18:30 -0600
Marc Verhaegen wrote:
>
> "Rich Travsky" <" traRvEsky"@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
> news:4323C98B.78921A63@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Marc Verhaegen wrote:
> > >
> > > "Rich Travsky" <" traRvEsky"@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
> > > news:431BD5A7.5AD5CA26@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > Marc Verhaegen wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > "Lee Olsen" <paleocity@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > > > > news:1125283954.105712.195690@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > >
> > > > > >I see, in spite of no physical evidence for a littoral
> specialization
> > > that
> > > > > AAT demands
> > > > >
> > > > > ??
> > > > > no physical evidence??
> > > >
> > > > Where are all the shell and fish bone middens?
> > >
> > > As you should know (but of course don't), fish bones almost don't
> conserve.
> >
> > Yes, fish bones do preserve.
>
> Look up: "almost".
Look up "you have less and less to support your scenario".
Now, shells should preserve very well. Where are those middens????
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: skinny runners
- From: Marc Verhaegen
- Re: skinny runners
- References:
- Re: skinny runners
- From: Rich Travsky
- Re: skinny runners
- From: Marc Verhaegen
- Re: skinny runners
- From: Rich Travsky
- Re: skinny runners
- From: Marc Verhaegen
- Re: skinny runners
- Prev by Date: Re: skinny runners
- Next by Date: Re: skinny runners
- Previous by thread: Re: skinny runners
- Next by thread: Re: skinny runners
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|