Re: skinny runners


Marc Verhaegen wrote:
> "Lee Olsen" <paleocity@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:1127051563.612585.192630@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > Marc Verhaegen wrote:
> > > "Lee Olsen" <paleocity@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > > news:1126957926.901451.205900@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > > >>> > > Why don't you cite your evidence?
> > >
> > > >>> > My cite that Dmanisi what coastal, yo mean??
> > >
> > > >>> My cite says lake or pond.
> > >
> > > >> Yes. My cite too. What's your problem, Lee? Do you believe this
> > > contradicts our view?
> > >
> > > > Of course it contradicts "always by lakes or seas." I thought you knew
> a
> > > lake or pond wasn't a sea?
> > >
> > > As most dry apers, you're a pedantic hair-splitter: that's because you
> dan't
> > > have any serious arguments
> > > Just replace "lakes+seas" by "waterside/shoreline..." whatever.
> > > Point is: how does Dmanisi contrdicts our view IYO??
> >
> > As all aquamaniacs, you haven't made any coherent scenarios, so there
> > is nothing to refute.

No nonsense, Marc:
- The aquamaniacs have no scenario at all. They have nothing: they
can't explain why we lost our fur, why we got SC fat, why we became
plantigrade, why we reduced olfaction etc.etc.
- Savanna scenario says that our ancestors at some times after the H/P
split lived along the shallow runnels & their diet included meat from
savanna animals, and that this is completely compatible with all human
features. Simple. You simply can't refute this.

>
>
>
> > > > If so, explain why you think so. If you can't, please shut up.
> > > > > FYI, this is our view:
> > > > >
> > > > > AAT says
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Saying something does't make it so. You are being very
> > > > non-professional.
> > >
> > > I'm trying to explain it in simple words for simple-minded people.
> > > Replace "say" by "hypothesises/climas/sugests" whatever, my childish
> > > hair-splitter.
> >
Name calling is the only scenario you ever had.

>
>
>
> > > > that sea/lake-side ancestors collected coconuts, fruits, bird eggs,
> > > > > turtles, shell-, crayfish, algae etc. This explains unique Homo
> traits
> > > (not
> > > > > seen in apes or apiths) better than plains- or forest-dwelling
> scenarios
> > > do:
> > > > > brain size, diving skills, breathing control, vocality, small mouth
> &
> > > > > chewing muscles, tongue bone descent, longer airway, projecting
> nose,
> > > poor
> > > > > sense of smell, handiness, tool use, late puberty, long legs,
> aligned
> > > body,
> > > > > poor climbing, fatness, fur loss, high needs of water, sodium,
> iodine &
> > > > > poly-unsaturated fatty acids etc. In the fossil & archeological
> record,
> > > we
> > > > > see this in the Plio-Pleistocene diaspora of Homo populations along
> the
> > > > > Indian Ocean, African coasts, Rift valley lakes etc. & from there
> inland
> > > > > along rivers etc.
> > > >
> > > > This is your scenario, the burden is on you to demonstrate that it is
> > > > true. Saying it is so is not science, but simply imagination.
> > >
> > > The burden is on your intelligence...
> > > So far, you have provided 0 counter-arguments...
> > > Zero.
>
Name calling is the only scenario you ever had.
>

>
> http://allserv.rug.ac.be/~mvaneech/outthere.htm
> http://www.onelist.com/community/AAT

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Bye Guys!
    ... first step than a breakup or calling the cops. ... I don't think the scenario as I understood it from Catnipped ...
    (rec.pets.cats.anecdotes)
  • Re: mutex question
    ... In fact, as long as there are only 2 threads that may access the shared resource, this scenario may get slightly re-designed so that the approach in itself becomes safe. ... utilization - do-nothing whileloop is such a waste of CPU time, ... In fact, it could get improved with calling Sleepbefore checking the variable, but still, in terms of CPU utilization, this approach is unreasonable, compared to using system-defined synchronization objects ...
    (microsoft.public.win32.programmer.kernel)
  • Re: Bye Guys!
    ... first step than a breakup or calling the cops. ... I don't think the scenario as I understood it from Catnipped ...
    (rec.pets.cats.anecdotes)
  • Re: skinny runners
    ... you're a pedantic hair-splitter: ... Name calling is the only scenario you ever had. ... Saying it is so is not science, ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: skinny runners
    ... you cannot have a scenario that is just the opposite of what ... >> No name calling: your reasoning about the same as that of creationists. ... >> don't use evidence. ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)