Re: What replaced the Savanna Hypothesis?
- From: "Jois" <firstjois@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2005 14:17:14 -0400
"Mario Petrinovich" <mario.petrinovic1@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:dh3ilv$cdu$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Mario Petrinovich:
> > But,
> > since everybody were on Savanna, and AGAINST AAT, now it cannot be that
> > the AAT is a (the) true one. -- Mario
>
> Hence nothing replaced Savanna, neither nothing will, until the
> acceptance of AAT. -- Mario
>
>
Then you can think that fire theory over!
Mario, you are a trooper! Keep up the good work, you are the best of the
AAR crowd.
Jois
.
- References:
- What replaced the Savanna Hypothesis?
- From: Paul Crowley
- Re: What replaced the Savanna Hypothesis?
- From: Mario Petrinovich
- Re: What replaced the Savanna Hypothesis?
- From: Mario Petrinovich
- What replaced the Savanna Hypothesis?
- Prev by Date: Re: Post hoc accommodative argument
- Next by Date: Re: Obligate Non-Verbalism
- Previous by thread: Re: What replaced the Savanna Hypothesis?
- Next by thread: Re: What replaced the Savanna Hypothesis?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|