Re: grasp on the aquatic hypothesis


mclark wrote:
> "deowll" <deowll@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:0J2_e.4319$Pj3.1571@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > "Jois" <firstjois@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:PYCdnVMoadP6caveRVn-hA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>
> >> "Lee Olsen" <paleocity@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> >> news:1127504096.338509.89520@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>> Here is something more realistic on current AAT thinking:
> >>>
> >>> http://www.sfu.ca/~csmith/aat.html
> >>>
> >>> [Aquatic Ape (non)Theory]
> >>>
> >>>
> >> Lee, you could post this weekly or daily but for crying out loud start
> >> snipping Marco's trash. Bad enough it gets posted once but it wastes a
> >> lot
> >> of space in replies. We all know his trashy stuff by heart & have heart
> >> burn as it is.
> >>
> >> Jois
> >
> > Including the way he sludges it all over the place contradicting himself.
> > He can't even decide when our ancestors were in the water or how much
> > other than maybe all the time. Almost nothing he says adds up when looked
> > at hard.
> >
> > He is one reason for only looking at this news groups during the summer.
> > Nothing changes in his arguments no matter how void they are.
>
> Here, here! The proper place for Marco is the bottom of your
> bit bucket. His brand of snake oil is made from bull*** --as everyone
> knows. What's worse, the man is clearly some kind of demented
> ***. I ask you, who needs another *** in their life? I
> know I don't. The final irony is that both Lee and JAE have jumped
> all over my case in the past for my "tone". Who is filling this NG
> with vituperrious sludge now, and who are they addressing when
> they do? Let Pauline, Mario, Algis, et al have him --and they're
> welcome to him.

We all have the lines which we do and do not cross. Algis very rarely
cross it to the point that I think he needs abuse heaped on unprovoked.
I think he tries to remain civil, hypocritical as he is and (probably
not intentionally) liberal with truth and honesty as he is. I *try* to
avoid making it personal with him and draw my line at extending it to
any character attack beyond his person. Though what anyone considers
provoked is again subjective.

Marc on the other hand invites abuse with every post where he shows
he's unable to refrain from insulting not just a single poster, but
essentially any and all who don't agree with him. I think Algis and
Pauline (and maybe even Mario) are aware of this. What's peculiar is
that beyond that they don't seem to notice that he's also insane, that
he doesn't make any scientific sense at all. He's simply delusional
that there haven't been arguments obliterating his "scenario." He's on
some other planet where apparently fossil evidence isn't valid, where
archaeological evidence is meaningless and the comparative method is
reduced to some peculiar bastardized version where the abilities of
ostriches somehow place limits on the environments in which humans can
live (despite abundant evidence that no such limit exists).


> Here, this is how it's spelled <P_L_O_N_K>

For whatever reason, my newsreader knowledge just isn't up to snuff to
get xnews or any other non-google engine going. The temptations of the
flesh are weak and I just don't seem to be able to draw strength enough
to let Verhaegen post to himself.

.

Quantcast