Re: Obligate Bimanualism
- From: alas_my_loves@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 28 Sep 2005 14:25:59 -0700
Those are good points, Marc.
Can you think of any short-tail or tail-less vertebrate terrestrial
that locomotes compressionally obligate bipedally which has similar
length arms and legs? I'd think there is none and has never been one.
Its a pattern/rule-of-thumb/law, AFAICT. If true, Lucy had to follow
the law. She was a locomotive generalist. Both her ancesters and her
descendants may have been obligate bipedalists, but she wasn't.
DD
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Obligate Bimanualism
- From: Marc Verhaegen
- Re: Obligate Bimanualism
- References:
- Re: Obligate Bimanualism
- From: alas_my_loves
- Re: Obligate Bimanualism
- From: Mario Petrinovich
- Re: Obligate Bimanualism
- From: Marc Verhaegen
- Re: Obligate Bimanualism
- From: Mario Petrinovich
- Re: Obligate Bimanualism
- From: Mario Petrinovich
- Re: Obligate Bimanualism
- From: Marc Verhaegen
- Re: Obligate Bimanualism
- From: alas_my_loves
- Re: Obligate Bimanualism
- From: Marc Verhaegen
- Re: Obligate Bimanualism
- Prev by Date: Re: savanna nonsense (Re: September is Baby Safety Month
- Next by Date: Re: Obligate bipedalism
- Previous by thread: Re: Obligate Bimanualism
- Next by thread: Re: Obligate Bimanualism
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|