Re: grasp on the aquatic hypothesis
- From: "rmacfarl" <rmacfarl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 29 Sep 2005 03:52:16 -0700
mclark wrote:
....
> The final irony is that both Lee and JAE have jumped
> all over my case in the past for my "tone".
A fair point...
....
> Here, this is how it's spelled <P_L_O_N_K>
A great suggestion...
Ross Macfarlane
> Now, whenever something crops up that is patently ridiculous, full
> of error, plain stupid, devoid of fact, or otherwise an affront
> to reason, I will dub it "Kuliukan".
- Michael Clark, 26-Jun-2005
.
- References:
- grasp on the aquatic hypothesis
- From: Marc Verhaegen
- Re: grasp on the aquatic hypothesis
- From: Lee Olsen
- Re: grasp on the aquatic hypothesis
- From: Jois
- Re: grasp on the aquatic hypothesis
- From: deowll
- Re: grasp on the aquatic hypothesis
- From: mclark
- grasp on the aquatic hypothesis
- Prev by Date: Re: A critique of the BBC aquatic ape programme and the transcript and crocs.
- Next by Date: Re: Savanna nonsense
- Previous by thread: Re: grasp on the aquatic hypothesis
- Next by thread: Obligate Non-Verbalism
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|