Re: Beyond the Savanna Mentality


JAE wrote:
> Jim McGinn wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > And yet the only thing you can dispute about my EGH is the nature of
> > its publication.
>
> I have several things that I dispute about your *claims*, like the
> generalization that humans are 'undisputedly' the most territorial
> creatures ever. You provide no metric for this claim other than that
> you don't dispute it.

What kind of metrics would you suggest?

> If it's central to anything you're building,
> you're building upon an unstable foundation.

It isn't central to my (undisputed) hypothesis.

> I'm not going to waste my
> time enumerating other problems with what you spew out. That's just a
> little starter because I think you're a loon and since you clearly
> don't take your work seriously, it doesn't impress upon me much of a
> reason to waste much time with it. When someone puts so little stock
> in their own work as you do, I don't see why I should put any effort
> into even trying to 'dispute' it. You put forward no impression that
> disputing it is worth the time.

If your goal is to dispute it then it is not
worth your time. It truly is an indisputable
hypothesis. If your goal is to deny it's
existence then you'd do best to never respond
to any of my posts again and hope that nobody
else catches on. But it's probably too late
for that.

Jim

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Jasons Dilemma
    ... >> Jim McGinn wrote: ... delusional-schmuck, er uh, Jimmy. ... complete enough to dispute in full form or to really bother with at ... but the fractions that squeak through in your various diatribes ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: Impeccable
    ... >> Jim McGinn wrote: ... >> not the genius that you claim to be. ... > up my solution to human evolution as evidence that supports this ... It would seem, then, that the best way to dispute my, to use ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: Why You May Never Comprehend Human Evolution
    ... > Jim McGinn wrote: ... >> dog whether he thinks your car needs a tune-up. ... inability to dispute it. ... detailed hypothesis that I presented. ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: Jasons Dilemma
    ... >> Jim McGinn wrote: ... >>> IOW, Jason, herein you've produced an incredibly lame ... >>> excuse for pretending to ignore my hypothesis. ... bothers to try to dispute your hypothesis is that it appears largely ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: Savanna nonsense
    ... >> Jim McGinn wrote: ... >>> You're the idiot to make climatic assumptions based on location alone. ... > fossil record upwards of 7 million years ago. ... You don't provide enough to dispute, ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
Loading