Re: Lucy not a knuckle-walker

From: "mclark" <mclark13@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: 27 Oct 2005 06:59:16 -0700

alas_my_loves@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> "Of all extant primates, humans are the only obligate bipeds." from
> Rich's post...
> By that definition, Hylobatidae is not an extant primate.
>
> WWWWhat is Hylobatidae?

Another wet ape showing off his research skills.

> DD

.

References:
- Re: Obligate Bimanualism
  - From: alas_my_loves
- Re: Obligate Bimanualism
  - From: Marc Verhaegen
- Re: Obligate Bimanualism
  - From: Rich Travsky
- Lucy parttime knuckle-walking (Re: Obligate Bimanualism
  - From: Marc Verhaegen
- Re: Lucy not a knuckle-walker (Re: Obligate Bimanualism
  - From: Rich Travsky
- Lucy not a knuckle-walker
  - From: spiznet
- Re: Lucy not a knuckle-walker
  - From: Rich Travsky

Prev by Date: Re: Early Hominids and Dry-Season Adaptations
Next by Date: Algis now claims the "coverup" involves RATS vs. CHIMPS
Previous by thread: Re: Lucy not a knuckle-walker
Next by thread: Re: Lucy not a knuckle-walker
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: Lucy not a knuckle-walker
... > "Of all extant primates, humans are the only obligate bipeds." ... Hylobatidae is not an extant primate. ...
(sci.anthropology.paleo)
Re: Beyond Obligate Aquaticism
... >> aren't obligate bipeds, fagitaboutem. ... > Would it be real science if Rich discussed Hylobatidae? ... he will be content to begin with doubts he shall end in certainties." ...
(sci.anthropology.paleo)
Re: Beyond Obligate Aquaticism
... > aren't obligate bipeds, fagitaboutem. ... Would it be real science if Rich discussed Hylobatidae? ...
(sci.anthropology.paleo)
Re: Beyond Obligate Aquaticism
... Rich, since you seem to avoid any reference to Hylobatidae, (the only ... non-human extant mammalian obligate biped) in your comparisons, ... aren't obligate bipeds, fagitaboutem. ...
(sci.anthropology.paleo)