Re: Lucy partial KWer (Re: Lucy not a knuckle-walker (Re: Obligate Bimanualism
- From: "Mario Petrinovich" <mario.petrinovic1@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 21:29:31 +0100
Marc Verhaegen:
> Mario, I see no indication apiths cooked their foods... And we don't chew
> our soup...
We chew spinach.
Apiths had diminished teeth. I see this as an indication of eating
cooked food.
Today we are eating cooked food. I mean, this must be a GREAT change
in diet. SO, this must be reflected in our teeth. When you notice a change
in our teeth, this is when we started to eat cooked food. They say that we
started to use fire 400kya. Do you see a change in our chewing appatathus as
a consequence, 400mya? Some say that we started to use fire 700mya. Do you
notice something 700mya? People say that they can read from teeth what kind
of food animal is eating. And they cannot read from teeth when we started to
cook our food? -- Mario
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Lucy partial KWer (Re: Lucy not a knuckle-walker (Re: Obligate Bimanualism
- From: Marc Verhaegen
- Re: Lucy partial KWer (Re: Lucy not a knuckle-walker (Re: Obligate Bimanualism
- From: Mario Petrinovich
- Re: Lucy partial KWer (Re: Lucy not a knuckle-walker (Re: Obligate Bimanualism
- References:
- Re: Lucy partial KWer (Re: Lucy not a knuckle-walker (Re: Obligate Bimanualism
- From: Marc Verhaegen
- Re: Lucy partial KWer (Re: Lucy not a knuckle-walker (Re: Obligate Bimanualism
- Prev by Date: Re: The Goldilocks AAT Theory
- Next by Date: Re: Lucy partial KWer (Re: Lucy not a knuckle-walker (Re: Obligate Bimanualism
- Previous by thread: Re: Lucy partial KWer (Re: Lucy not a knuckle-walker (Re: Obligate Bimanualism
- Next by thread: Re: Lucy partial KWer (Re: Lucy not a knuckle-walker (Re: Obligate Bimanualism
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|