Re: Pop Goes the Weasel
- From: "Marc Verhaegen" <fa204466@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 07:09:15 +0100
"Rich Travsky" <" traRvEsky"@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:436EB17A.445A5A0E@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Algis Kuliukas wrote:
> > What is remarkable is that despite all that, the AAH is still strikes a
strong chord with millions who do not realise that in paleoanthropological
circles it is just not de rigeur.
> Those "millions" with no paleo/anthro backround to draw upon...
?? All paleo/anthro background, you mean: you have proven to be unable to
give 1 argument against a waterside past of our ancestors.
.
- References:
- Re: Pop Goes the Weasel
- From: Rich Travsky
- Re: Pop Goes the Weasel
- Prev by Date: Re: [Fwd: (Forbes) Message In A DNA Bottle]
- Next by Date: Re: conservatism in science (Re: Not conceding on a mild form of the AAH
- Previous by thread: Re: Pop Goes the Weasel
- Next by thread: Re: Chimps And Their Control Of Their Vocalizations
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|