Re: conservatism in science (Re: Not conceding on a mild form of the AAH
- From: "Marc Verhaegen" <fa204466@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 07:13:39 +0100
"Rich Travsky" <" traRvEsky"@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:436EE343.184FAEF9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Marc Verhaegen wrote:
> >
> > "Algis Kuliukas" <algis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:1131162496.922211.307650@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > > Paul is quite close to the truth when he attacks the field of
> > paleoanthropology.
> >
> > Not only in PA: it's seen in every science where new insight arises: you
> > always have short-sighted conservative fanatics who are too stupid to
see
> > it: this was so in the times of Vesalius, Galileo, Wegener etc.etc.
> > --Marc
Travsky as usual evading & irrelevant:
> Lysenko. Velikovsky.
There are always short-sighted conservative fanatics who are too stupid to
see it: this was so in the times of Vesalius, Galileo, Wegener, Hardy
etc.etc.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: conservatism in science (Re: Not conceding on a mild form of the AAH
- From: Rich Travsky
- Re: conservatism in science (Re: Not conceding on a mild form of the AAH
- References:
- Finally conceding on a mild form of the AAH
- From: Algis Kuliukas
- Not conceding on a mild form of the AAH
- From: rmacfarl
- Re: Not conceding on a mild form of the AAH
- From: Algis Kuliukas
- Re: Not conceding on a mild form of the AAH
- From: rmacfarl
- conservatism in science (Re: Not conceding on a mild form of the AAH
- From: Marc Verhaegen
- Finally conceding on a mild form of the AAH
- Prev by Date: Re: Pop Goes the Weasel
- Next by Date: Re: My Med.Hyp.papers are very speculative.
- Previous by thread: conservatism in science (Re: Not conceding on a mild form of the AAH
- Next by thread: Re: conservatism in science (Re: Not conceding on a mild form of the AAH
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|