Re: Impeccable


JAE wrote:

<snip>

> Please feel free to try to get anyone to buy into your ideas, but be
> aware that you are unlikely to be anything other than completely and
> totally irrelevant whilst you continue with your present course.

Hmm. Well, you may have a point there. If your stubborn evasiveness
is any indication of the state of the paradigm (and I have a lot of
good
reasons to conclude that it is representative of the state of the
paradigm
and absolutely no evidence to conclude that it is not) then you are
probably right. But then again I think that any rational person that
read
this thread would immediately recognize that you're hidding something
there buddy. And who's to say where that might lead them.

Jim

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Cardinality question
    ... school, I was taught that zero was a place holder for a number, therefore was not a number itself, but rather was an artifact of positional notation of numerals. ... "...how an individual invents a new way of giving order to data now all assembled must here remain inscrutable and may be permanently so... ... Almost always the men who achieve these fundamental inventions of new paradigm have either been very young or very new to the field whose paradigm they change... ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: OT: McCain concedes
    ... Credit is hard to come by these days. ... Brother can you paradigm? ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: The Depths of Jims Genius
    ... JAE wrote: ... >> It appears to me that you have no evidence based dispute with ... Prev by Date: ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: KRS archaeology
    ... Inger E Johansson wrote: ... > still have the Old Paradigm rocking back and forth but it does a bit problem ... > standing as it once did. ...
    (sci.archaeology)