Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths
- From: "Jim McGinn" <jimmcginn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 09:18:10 GMT
"Richard Dawkins" <Dawkins@xxxxxxxx> wrote
> "Species that were once thought to have turned into
> others have been found to overlap in time with these
> alleged descendants.
Well, overlooking the ambigous terminology here, yes, it's true, the fossil
record is not as simplistically gradulistic as some first assumed.
> In fact, the fossil record does
> not convincingly document a single transition from one
> species to another."
This also is true. Fossils are so incredibly rare that if they did indicate
a gradual transition from one species to another we'd have to suspect that
the evidence was manufactured (and this doesn't even take into account the
effects of punctuated equillibrium.)
> (Stanley, S.M., The New
> Evolutionary Timetable: Fossils, Genes, and the Origin
> of Species, 1981, p. 95)
Are you saying the fossil evidence indicates intelligent design? If you are
then I think you need to begin supporting your position.
Jim
.
- References:
- Absence of Canines in Apiths
- From: Jim McGinn
- Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths
- From: Richard Dawkins
- Absence of Canines in Apiths
- Prev by Date: Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths
- Previous by thread: Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths
- Next by thread: Delayed maturation of females in Senegal
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|