Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths


Jim McGinn wrote:
> "JAE" <jae@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:1133458908.157658.93360@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > quercophile wrote:
> > > Jim McGinn wrote:
> > >
> > > > Communal selection explains it. Not warfare. Chimp vs. chimp
> warefare is
> > > > completely impossible for a species that has yet to achieve ecological
> > > > dominance. It is only after Apith achieved ecological dominance that
> apith
> > > > vs. apith wars are possible.
> > >
> > >
> > > Jane Goodall observed one troop of chimps systematically killing all
> > > the male and older female members of an adjacent trioop, taking over a
> > > large chunk of their territory, (They were unable to patrol it all and
> > > lost some to other adjacent chimp troops.) and co-opting the fecund
> > > females. Maybe you don't want to call it warfare but it looks like it
> > > to me.
> >
> > Jim will most likely not regard this as warfare (or warefare, whatever
> > that is).
>
> Yes, you're right. Read my response to Q and see if you can address it's
> details on a point by point basis.

No point. When you compare anything to your "hypothesis," you've lost
it since you can't seem to show anyone where your hypothesis exists in
any form other than the bizarre multiple postings of a clearly
psychologically challenged delusional megalomaniac who exists as an
'expert' only in his own dreadfully undermedicated mind. While your
'hypothesis' is still not in any form that anyone can address (e.g.
while you still claim that it's the product of many postings) and like
a scared little puppy terrified of presening anything comprehensible
for fear of destroying the illusion that only he believes, there's no
point in responding to you on a 'point by point' basis because on point
one, having a coherant thought, you've failed miserably.

.