Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths


"JAE" <jae@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1133580415.880427.93850@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Jim McGinn wrote:
>
>
> > Hey, that's my insult. Go get your own. Next thing you know you'll be
> > claiming my hypothesis as your own.
>
> Not that I expect Ross to try to wade through the sea of posts designed
> by your own mental illness to resolve whatever the hell it is that is
> your 'hypothesis,' but since you've not published a thing, since you
> seem both unwilling and incapable of putting something coherant
> together, you'd both be powerless to stop him and would remain as
> irrelevant as you are. So why again is it that you don't actually put
> together your hypothesis in a form that's accessible to anyone who
> doesn't inhabit the defective brain of Jim McGinn?

Don't you know any other tunes. You're starting to bore me.

>
>
> [snip]
>
> > Like I said, it's easy to make big claims. Its hard to back them up.
>
> Damn it, Jim. You've got to stop doing that. This is the third
> irony-o-meter you've overloaded this week. Really, you ought to be
> more considerate when you post that sort of stuff.
>


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths
    ... > Hey, that's my insult. ... > claiming my hypothesis as your own. ... doesn't inhabit the defective brain of Jim McGinn? ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths
    ... >> Jim McGinn wrote: ... >>> Hey, that's my insult. ... Don't you know that you're an irrelevant delusional nutcase? ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: The McGinn Doctrine
    ... >>> Jim McGinn to Paul 062105 ... >>> No time for grammar. ... > Hey, Su, does he mean me or you? ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)