Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths


Jim McGinn wrote:
> "JAE" <jae@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:1133580415.880427.93850@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > Jim McGinn wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Hey, that's my insult. Go get your own. Next thing you know you'll be
> > > claiming my hypothesis as your own.
> >
> > Not that I expect Ross to try to wade through the sea of posts designed
> > by your own mental illness to resolve whatever the hell it is that is
> > your 'hypothesis,' but since you've not published a thing, since you
> > seem both unwilling and incapable of putting something coherant
> > together, you'd both be powerless to stop him and would remain as
> > irrelevant as you are. So why again is it that you don't actually put
> > together your hypothesis in a form that's accessible to anyone who
> > doesn't inhabit the defective brain of Jim McGinn?
>
> Don't you know any other tunes. You're starting to bore me.

Hit a bit too close to home, huh?

Don't you know that you're an irrelevant delusional nutcase?

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths
    ... >> Hey, that's my insult. ... >> claiming my hypothesis as your own. ... > doesn't inhabit the defective brain of Jim McGinn? ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths
    ... > Hey, that's my insult. ... > claiming my hypothesis as your own. ... doesn't inhabit the defective brain of Jim McGinn? ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths
    ... >>> Not that I expect Ross to try to wade through the sea of posts designed ... >>> doesn't inhabit the defective brain of Jim McGinn? ... > Don't you know that you're an irrelevant delusional nutcase? ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: The McGinn Doctrine
    ... >>> Jim McGinn to Paul 062105 ... >>> No time for grammar. ... > Hey, Su, does he mean me or you? ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
Loading