Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths


Jim McGinn wrote:
> JAE wrote:
> > Jim McGinn wrote:
> > > JAE wrote:
> > > > Jim McGinn wrote:
> > > > > JAE wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Since your 'hypothesis' isn't in any state such that it can be
> > > > > > critically reviewed because you've steadfastly refused to organize
> > > > > > whatever thoughts you have, what's left is to dispute some of the
> > > > > > claims you've made. You've made the claim that a hunter-gatherer
> > > > > > lifestyle is something new.
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes. Or, at best it is so vague as to be meaningless (untestable
> > > > > against the evidence).
> > > > >
> > > > > > I dispute this because abundant
> > > > > > archaeological evidence suggests otherwise.
> > > > >
> > > > > I would have thought it obvious to you by now that I'm not the kind of
> > > > > person to take anybody's word on something like this. If you are aware
> > > > > of such evidence then you should refer to it specifically.
> > > >
> > > > A curious request from someone who has, to the best of my knowledge,
> > > > never cited a single source in support of his views. There's a wealth
> > > > of data surrounding hunter-gatherer studies.
> > >
> > > For early hominids?
> >
> > Why don't you try reading and find out.
>
> So despite the fact that you are unable to dispute any aspect of my
> hypothesis I'm supposed to take your word for it that somewhere in this
> book there's information that will refute my hypothesis. Yeah, right.
> Like I haven't heard that toothless assertion a hundred times on this
> NG.

Well, Jim, I think I realize your problem. You appear dead-set in
repeating a lie. That lie is that I am unable to dispute your
'hypothesis.' Now normally, repeating a lie would make you a liar, but
since you're not altogether there, since your brain doesn't work right,
it's probably unfair to call you a liar. You're just nuts.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths
    ... > Jim McGinn wrote: ... >>> repeating a lie. ... That lie is that I am unable to dispute your ... >> dispute of my hypothesis in some obscure book. ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths
    ... > Jim McGinn wrote: ... You told a lie or two. ... Mol Anthro http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DNAanthro/ ... Evol. ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths
    ... Jim McGinn wrote: ... You told a lie or two. ... you read or did you not read a book and actually went skiing? ... making shit up to defend your lie. ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths
    ... >> Jim McGinn wrote: ... >> you'd been skiing all day and that's why you posted in the wrong group. ... I'll guess that at least one of those is a lie. ... it's true that most people on SBE do not know who I am. So what? ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: Have your hurricane in a swing state in an election year
    ... > How inconvenient for Hickey to point out that he was repeating a lie ... > liberal rag Washington Post was caught in the same lie, ... Is he a liar too? ...
    (rec.bicycles.tech)