Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths


Jim McGinn wrote:
> JAE wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> > > So despite the fact that you are unable to dispute any aspect of my
> > > hypothesis I'm supposed to take your word for it that somewhere in this
> > > book there's information that will refute my hypothesis. Yeah, right.
> > > Like I haven't heard that toothless assertion a hundred times on this
> > > NG.
> >
> > Well, Jim, I think I realize your problem. You appear dead-set in
> > repeating a lie. That lie is that I am unable to dispute your
> > 'hypothesis.' Now normally, repeating a lie would make you a liar, but
> > since you're not altogether there, since your brain doesn't work right,
> > it's probably unfair to call you a liar. You're just nuts.
>
> Oh, I get it. I'm supposed to take your word for it that there is some
> dispute of my hypothesis in some obscure book.

You do not have to take my word for it. You can get the book and see
for yourself; it is not so 'obscure' as to be difficult to obtain. I
have no faith that you will do this, but you could do so rather easily.
Now why again is it that you don't seem to be familliar with any work
actually relevant to your claims?

> And you are suggesting that *I'm* nuts?

Yes. I'm suggesting that you're nuts.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths
    ... > Jim McGinn wrote: ... >>> repeating a lie. ... That lie is that I am unable to dispute your ... >> dispute of my hypothesis in some obscure book. ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths
    ... That lie is that I am unable to dispute your ... > it's probably unfair to call you a liar. ... And you are suggesting that *I'm* nuts? ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: Jasons Dilemma
    ... >> Jim McGinn wrote: ... delusional-schmuck, er uh, Jimmy. ... complete enough to dispute in full form or to really bother with at ... but the fractions that squeak through in your various diatribes ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: Impeccable
    ... >> Jim McGinn wrote: ... >> not the genius that you claim to be. ... > up my solution to human evolution as evidence that supports this ... It would seem, then, that the best way to dispute my, to use ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: Why You May Never Comprehend Human Evolution
    ... > Jim McGinn wrote: ... >> dog whether he thinks your car needs a tune-up. ... inability to dispute it. ... detailed hypothesis that I presented. ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)