Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths


Jim McGinn wrote:
> "JAE" <jae@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:1133803984.630186.175740@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > Jim McGinn wrote:
> >> JAE wrote:
> >>
> >> <snip>
> >>
> >> > > So despite the fact that you are unable to dispute any aspect of my
> >> > > hypothesis I'm supposed to take your word for it that somewhere in
> >> > > this
> >> > > book there's information that will refute my hypothesis. Yeah,
> >> > > right.
> >> > > Like I haven't heard that toothless assertion a hundred times on this
> >> > > NG.
> >> >
> >> > Well, Jim, I think I realize your problem. You appear dead-set in
> >> > repeating a lie. That lie is that I am unable to dispute your
> >> > 'hypothesis.' Now normally, repeating a lie would make you a liar, but
> >> > since you're not altogether there, since your brain doesn't work right,
> >> > it's probably unfair to call you a liar. You're just nuts.
> >>
> >> Oh, I get it. I'm supposed to take your word for it that there is some
> >> dispute of my hypothesis in some obscure book.
> >
> > You do not have to take my word for it. You can get the book and see
> > for yourself; it is not so 'obscure' as to be difficult to obtain. I
> > have no faith that you will do this, but you could do so rather easily.
> > Now why again is it that you don't seem to be familliar with any work
> > actually relevant to your claims?
>
> I just went to the library today. I found the book and read it from cover
> to cover, one painstaking chapter at a time. And I didn't find anything in
> there that disputes my hypothesis. So it seems, Jason, that you are the
> liar here.

Which library?

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Jasons Dilemma
    ... >> Jim McGinn wrote: ... delusional-schmuck, er uh, Jimmy. ... complete enough to dispute in full form or to really bother with at ... but the fractions that squeak through in your various diatribes ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: Impeccable
    ... >> Jim McGinn wrote: ... >> not the genius that you claim to be. ... > up my solution to human evolution as evidence that supports this ... It would seem, then, that the best way to dispute my, to use ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: Why You May Never Comprehend Human Evolution
    ... > Jim McGinn wrote: ... >> dog whether he thinks your car needs a tune-up. ... inability to dispute it. ... detailed hypothesis that I presented. ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: Jasons Dilemma
    ... >> Jim McGinn wrote: ... >>> IOW, Jason, herein you've produced an incredibly lame ... >>> excuse for pretending to ignore my hypothesis. ... bothers to try to dispute your hypothesis is that it appears largely ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: Savanna nonsense
    ... >> Jim McGinn wrote: ... >>> You're the idiot to make climatic assumptions based on location alone. ... > fossil record upwards of 7 million years ago. ... You don't provide enough to dispute, ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)