Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths
- From: "Jim McGinn" <jimmcginn@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 6 Dec 2005 01:37:21 -0800
JAE wrote:
> > I just went to the library today. I found the book and read it from cover
> > to cover, one painstaking chapter at a time. And I didn't find anything in
> > there that disputes my hypothesis. So it seems, Jason, that you are the
> > liar here.
>
> Which library?
You don't believe me? Good, because I don't believe you either.
You're a liar, Jason. There's nothing in that book that disputes my
hypothesis and the only reason you referred to it was because of your
desperation.
Which page is the dispute?
You answer my question first, you evasive twit.
Jim
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths
- From: JAE
- Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths
- From: MClark
- Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths
- References:
- Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths
- From: JAE
- Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths
- From: Jim McGinn
- Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths
- From: JAE
- Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths
- From: Jim McGinn
- Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths
- From: JAE
- Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths
- From: Jim McGinn
- Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths
- From: JAE
- Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths
- From: Jim McGinn
- Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths
- From: JAE
- Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths
- From: Jim McGinn
- Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths
- From: JAE
- Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths
- From: Jim McGinn
- Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths
- From: JAE
- Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths
- From: Jim McGinn
- Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths
- From: JAE
- Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths
- Prev by Date: Re: KOOK FAQ:Raymond Michael Ambrosini
- Next by Date: Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths
- Previous by thread: Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths
- Next by thread: Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths
- Index(es):