Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths


Jim McGinn wrote:
> "JAE" <jae@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:1133936627.252319.113000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > Jim McGinn wrote:
> >> "JAE" <jae@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
> >>
> >> >> Read upthread. We're not talking about the same books here.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > What book are you talking about, Jim? I mentioned two books. Which
> >> > one did you read?
> >> >
> >>
> >> Well, if you read upthread, as I suggested, you'd be able to answer your
> >> own
> >> question. Okidoke?
> >
> > No, dickless, it didn't answer the question. I mentioned two books.
> > You said you read that book but didn't specify which one. That is
> > unless the answer is that you're a lying sack of *** and you didn't
> > read a damn thing. That answer is one we already knew though.
> >
>
> Are you saying there's anything in these books that has direct bearing on my
> hypothesis? Indirect? Anything? Anything at all?

You dodged the question. Which book are you claiming to have read?
It's irrelevant to my question whether or not anything contradicts your
mythical hypothesis. You claimed to have read something and then said
you didn't remember the title, then said you were referring to another
book, then claimed you were actually skiing at the time you said you
were reading the book. Your story doesn't pan out. Now, which book
were you lying about reading, Jimmy?

.

Quantcast