Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths
- From: "JAE" <jae@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 7 Dec 2005 10:08:41 -0800
Jim McGinn wrote:
> "JAE" <jae@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > Now how again do you explain that you were both at the library reading
> > a book all day and skiing? Perhaps because one or both was a lie?
> >
>
> Go whine to somebody else. I called your bluff and you folded. If you want
> to see my cards you have to pay.
No, you didn't call my bluff. You told a lie or two. Which book did
you read or did you not read a book and actually went skiing? Your
various claims don't add up. You got caught in that lie and now you're
making *** up to defend your lie. You're a sad sack of ***, McGinn.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths
- From: Philip Deitiker
- Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths
- References:
- Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths
- From: JAE
- Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths
- From: Jim McGinn
- Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths
- From: JAE
- Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths
- From: Jim McGinn
- Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths
- From: JAE
- Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths
- From: Jim McGinn
- Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths
- From: JAE
- Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths
- From: Jim McGinn
- Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths
- From: JAE
- Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths
- From: mclark
- Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths
- From: Jim McGinn
- Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths
- From: JAE
- Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths
- From: Jim McGinn
- Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths
- From: JAE
- Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths
- From: Jim McGinn
- Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths
- Prev by Date: Re: Excuse #6: The 5 diversionary questions. Excuse #7: Shirley Pygmies?
- Next by Date: Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths
- Previous by thread: Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths
- Next by thread: Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths
- Index(es):