Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths


"JAE" <jae@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1133983289.694984.157410@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Jim McGinn wrote:
>
>
>> If your question has no bearing on my hypothesis then why do you pose it?
>
> If you didn't read the book, why did you say you did?
>

Reread the question above, make an honest attempt to answer it, and then
we'll see if we can continue the dicussion.

Jim


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths
    ... > Jim McGinn wrote: ... > skiing makes it look like you're a liar, Jimmy. ... If your question has no bearing on my hypothesis then why do you pose it? ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths
    ... Jim McGinn wrote: ... > If your question has no bearing on my hypothesis then why do you pose it? ... Prev by Date: ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: Richards Turn
    ... Jim McGinn wrote: ... > Gatekeeper Hypothesis. ... Jimmy? ... Prev by Date: ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: The Depths of Jims Genius
    ... What's more frustrating? ... dispute it? ... Jim McGinn ... Prev by Date: ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: Absence of Canines in Apiths
    ... >> Jim McGinn wrote: ... >>> If your question has no bearing on my hypothesis then why do you pose it? ... discussion because you are not honest. ... I think you've provided ample evidence that you are lying in your own ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
Quantcast