Re: Forum for rational scientific debate?


Jois wrote:
<richardparker01@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1150674896.946343.133690@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Contributions to the discussions conducted in this forum by Macfarlane
and McLark can be seen at:

And we hope to see your further contributions at some forum but not here.
We can only hope.

Jois

Jois - you can be a real 'moderator' of a discussion forum, or you can
take sides.

I have only quoted what those two contributors said entirely by
themselves.

Are you a 'moderator' or partial?

This is maybe the first time that I've deliberately been
confrontational. I'm a bit fed up with being attacked by people who
haven't, really, anything much more to say than personal insults.

Reasoned responses are what any forum like this is about, however crazy
anyone thinks the ideas might be. You can answer politely and
reasonably, or you can produce the sort of response that these two have
done.

If you're the ''moderator' of this entirely open and free discussion
group, then you should comment on personal insults.

My message was not a personal insult in any way:

"I have only quoted what those two contributors said entirely by
themselves".

If I display a lack of respect for a couple of old wallies that have
been hovering around this "entirely open and free discussion group" for
some years, then I can only ask that they engage their minds before
they hit the keyboard.

regards

Richard

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Forum for rational scientific debate?
    ... Jois wrote: ... And we hope to see your further contributions at some forum but not ... Jois - you can be a real 'moderator' of a discussion forum, ... My issue with Dickie-boy isn't so much his ideas as his personality, ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: Forum for rational scientific debate?
    ... And we hope to see your further contributions at some forum but not ... Jois - you can be a real 'moderator' of a discussion forum, ... Ick! ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: Gabriels Theorem
    ... >on this forum were born, the Average Value theorem did not exist. ... Many contributors have pointed out that it's an utterly trivial ... that _every_ participant here is an idiot. ... David C. Ullrich ...
    (sci.math)
  • Gabriels Theorem
    ... a special case of it which leads to what he calls the average tangent ... The ATT if true can be used to ... In 1980 which is way before most of the contributors ... You will no doubt find a lot of comments posted on this forum mostly by ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Bus diversion due to closure of Battersea Bridge
    ... >I have to say that some of the responses here rather suggest that some ... >contributors to this forum seem to think that those big red things ... >chugging along the road, for which we all pay through Council Tax etc., ...
    (uk.transport.london)