Re: Forum for rational scientific debate?


"Jois" <firstjois@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:24SdnYPzDqg8kwvZnZ2dnUVZ_rednZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<richardparker01@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1150680362.555287.191770@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Jois wrote:
<richardparker01@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1150674896.946343.133690@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Contributions to the discussions conducted in this forum by
Macfarlane
and McLark can be seen at:

And we hope to see your further contributions at some forum but not
here.
We can only hope.

Jois

Jois - you can be a real 'moderator' of a discussion forum, or you can
take sides.

I have only quoted what those two contributors said entirely by
themselves.

Are you a 'moderator' or partial?

This is maybe the first time that I've deliberately been
confrontational. I'm a bit fed up with being attacked by people who
haven't, really, anything much more to say than personal insults.

[snip]

If I display a lack of respect for a couple of old wallies that have
been hovering around this "entirely open and free discussion group" for
some years, then I can only ask that they engage their minds before
they hit the keyboard.

regards

Richard

It isn't so much a lack of respect but that I'm 78% sure you are one of
the
ATT group who decided to post here to stir something up and said so in
that
forum months ago.

So, your excuse for never having presented any content in your messages is
that you are too busy protecting this NG from AAT conspiracies?

Heck, it might have been a year ago. IF that's your goal
then you should be ready for what you do stir up.

What is it about stirring up that, it seems, gives you such trepidations?

You can float whatever ideas you want but why would you want to do so
before
such a disinterested and unappreciative crowd?

Jois, why would you pretend to know other people's interests? Maybe you
should be less concerned with what other people shouldn't think and more
concerned with communicating what you think--assuming you think anything at
all.

Don't be shy now, Jois. Go ahead. Tell us your thinking on the
transitional years from apes to the first hominids? Go ahead. If nothing
else it ought to be good for a few laughs.


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Forum for rational scientific debate?
    ... And we hope to see your further contributions at some forum but not ... Jois - you can be a real 'moderator' of a discussion forum, ... then you should be ready for what you do stir up. ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: Forum for rational scientific debate?
    ... Jois wrote: ... And we hope to see your further contributions at some forum but not ... Jois - you can be a real 'moderator' of a discussion forum, ... My issue with Dickie-boy isn't so much his ideas as his personality, ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: Forum for rational scientific debate?
    ... And we hope to see your further contributions at some forum but not ... Jois - you can be a real 'moderator' of a discussion forum, ... Ick! ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: Forum for rational scientific debate?
    ... Why don' you tell us about your content oriented contributions to this ... illustrious newsgroup, Jois. ... they didn't start the insults and here you are. ... I've been looking into this forum for some time now, and I have never, ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: Forum for rational scientific debate?
    ... And we hope to see your further contributions at some forum but not here. ... Jois - you can be a real 'moderator' of a discussion forum, ... haven't, really, anything much more to say than personal insults. ... "I have only quoted what those two contributors said entirely by ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)