Re: Forum for rational scientific debate?
- From: "Jois" <firstjois@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 09:22:19 -0400
"Claudius Denk" <cladiusdenk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:v1tlg.149324$F_3.100577@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Because Ross isn't possessed?
"rmacfarl" <rmacfarl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
I like Algis, I really do, in spite of everything. Despite all the
extremely terse exchanges we've had, I find his Usenet persona to be
one of sincerity,
That's because Algis was/is sincere. With Algis, unlike yourself Ross, if
you asked him a question he'd answer it.
Actually there were billions of question Algis wouldn't answer, there are
billions of questions no one can answer. The sad part about science is
sometimes you have to live long enough for answers to be found.
Jois
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Forum for rational scientific debate?
- From: Jim McGinn
- Re: Forum for rational scientific debate?
- References:
- Forum for rational scientific debate?
- From: richardparker01
- Re: Forum for rational scientific debate?
- From: Jois
- Re: Forum for rational scientific debate?
- From: richardparker01
- Re: Forum for rational scientific debate?
- From: Jois
- Re: Forum for rational scientific debate?
- From: rmacfarl
- Re: Forum for rational scientific debate?
- From: Claudius Denk
- Forum for rational scientific debate?
- Prev by Date: Re: Fire, king of beasts (was Re: Terra firma hominids)
- Next by Date: Re: Forum for rational scientific debate?
- Previous by thread: Re: Forum for rational scientific debate?
- Next by thread: Re: Forum for rational scientific debate?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|