Re: Forum for rational scientific debate?


Jois wrote:
"Claudius Denk" <cladiusdenk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:0wslg.149320$F_3.22423@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"Jois" <firstjois@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:zbKdnSsugInCcwjZnZ2dnUVZ_tqdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<richardparker01@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1150674896.946343.133690@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Contributions to the discussions conducted in this forum by Macfarlane
and McLark can be seen at:

And we hope to see your further contributions at some forum but not
here.
We can only hope.

Why don' you tell us about your content oriented contributions to this
illustrious newsgroup, Jois. I bet even Michael Clark has you beat. It's
silly that you fools don't realize that your inability to formulate
thoughts
of your own renders your opinions worthless. How do you explain the
absence
of thought associated with your posts, Jois? Brain damage?


Why do you read here?

You know, when things get bad here the ATT group says that they didn't start
the name calling, they didn't start the insults and here you are. Revving
up those engines.

Jois

"You know, when things get bad here the ATT group says that they didn't
start the name calling, they didn't start the insults and here you are.
Revving > up those engines"

What, exactly, is the "ATT group"?

I may be one, but I really don't like that tone of confrontation, as if
I might have once been, or even talked to, a "member of the Communist
Party". I'm sure you're old enough to remember that

I've been looking into this forum for some time now, and I have never,
ever seen a personal insult from anyone who might align to the AAT.

(Except from Marc, and that's only because what he says means something
quite different, and a lot less blunt, in his original Flemish)

I've seen plenty from the 'other side' and wonder if they aren't
feeling a bit insecure.

regards

Richard

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Forum for rational scientific debate?
    ... Jois wrote: ... And we hope to see your further contributions at some forum but not ... Jois - you can be a real 'moderator' of a discussion forum, ... My issue with Dickie-boy isn't so much his ideas as his personality, ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: Forum for rational scientific debate?
    ... And we hope to see your further contributions at some forum but not ... Jois - you can be a real 'moderator' of a discussion forum, ... Ick! ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: Forum for rational scientific debate?
    ... And we hope to see your further contributions at some forum but not ... Jois - you can be a real 'moderator' of a discussion forum, ... then you should be ready for what you do stir up. ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: Forum for rational scientific debate?
    ... And we hope to see your further contributions at some forum but not ... Jois - you can be a real 'moderator' of a discussion forum, ... then you should be ready for what you do stir up. ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: Oops, Back to the You Know What
    ... > Although Jois is not my pal, I think she is doing a fine job. ... Because I'm an AAH proponent? ... AAH but they tend to avoid insults and bigotry. ... Algis Kuliukas ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
Loading