Re: Forum for rational scientific debate?
- From: "nickname" <alas_my_loves@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 28 Jun 2006 08:57:04 -0700
Great sig!
I can't imagine why a newsgroup should be expected to be a contributor
to
the science of anything what so ever. Jois
Jois wrote:
<richardparker01@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1151285245.551392.325150@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
rmacfarl wrote:
Jois wrote
"MClark" <men@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
...Without Mario, life would be alot less entertaining:
"Today we are nothing like primates."
-- Mario 10/31/2005
You're gonna have to get up alot earlier in the morning
if you hope to comptete with that kind of writing, mister.
Geeze, I haven't read the sig files in a while:
"I don't pretend [to be a world class evolutionary theorist] either.
(I don't need to. I let my content speak for me on this point.)"
- Jim McGinn, 17-Feb-2003.(It does.)
Ross Macfarlane :-)
Come back, Algis! All is forgiven!-- MClark, 03 Dec 2005
This is 'hugely entertaining' stuff, but rational debate, no.
Sounds more like - "I sez to 'im, and she sez to me, so I sez back, so
'e sez.... and we all pick on someone whose English is not quite as
wonderful as our American/Australian.
Good stuff - keep it up. Helps to make SAP such a wonderful contributor
to the science of Paleoanthro-apology.
regards
Richard
I can't imagine why a newsgroup should be expected to be a contributor to
the science of anything what so ever. Newsgroup implies that we make news?
I don't think so.
And if you want to "and we all pick on someone whose English is not quite
as wonderful as our American/Australian." please do it someplace else. If,
on the other hand you think Marco is getting the treatment royal because of
his English, you need to do a little close reasoning with Mario.
Good Grief!
Jois
.
- References:
- Forum for rational scientific debate?
- From: richardparker01
- Re: Forum for rational scientific debate?
- From: Jois
- Re: Forum for rational scientific debate?
- From: richardparker01
- Re: Forum for rational scientific debate?
- From: Jois
- Re: Forum for rational scientific debate?
- From: Claudius Denk
- Re: Forum for rational scientific debate?
- From: Jois
- Re: Forum for rational scientific debate?
- From: MClark
- Re: Forum for rational scientific debate?
- From: Jois
- Re: Forum for rational scientific debate?
- From: rmacfarl
- Re: Forum for rational scientific debate?
- From: richardparker01
- Re: Forum for rational scientific debate?
- From: Jois
- Forum for rational scientific debate?
- Prev by Date: H. sapiens vs. H. neandertal
- Next by Date: Re: Fire, king of beasts (was Re: Terra firma hominids)
- Previous by thread: Re: Forum for rational scientific debate?
- Next by thread: Re: Forum for rational scientific debate?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|