Re: Not Enough Data
- From: "Paul Crowley" <slkwuoiutiuytciuyik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 22:18:24 +0100
"Gerrit Hanenburg" <G.Hanenburg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:vmcsj2t3n2sc2k5sl5f8hpovbjf2524r5a@xxxxxxxxxx
The question is which is the 'negative state'.
The basis of your thinking is your assumption
that all hominids before about 12 kya were non-
sedentary. That notion is ancient and pre-dates
both the concept of niche and the realisation
that most mammals and all (or nearly all) primates
are territorial. It also pre-dates the realisation
that almost every human society (or culture) is
both sedentary and fiercely territorial.
Such an assumption therefore has no place
whatever in any modern science.
Name the archeological sites that indicate permanent settlement
(sedentism) prior to circa 12 kya.
There was a certain event at 12 kya which
had a drastic effect on the record.
Ignorance of that event, and of the immensity
of its implications, is another major element in
the 'thinking' on which the whole of current
PA rests, and which form the basis for your
assumption above.
Paul.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Not Enough Data
- From: Gerrit Hanenburg
- Re: Not Enough Data
- From: claudiusdenk
- Re: Not Enough Data
- References:
- Re: Not Enough Data
- From: Paul Crowley
- Re: Not Enough Data
- From: Jim McGinn
- Re: Not Enough Data
- From: MClark
- Re: Not Enough Data
- From: Jim McGinn
- Re: Not Enough Data
- From: rmacfarl
- Re: Not Enough Data
- From: Jim McGinn
- Re: Not Enough Data
- From: Gerrit Hanenburg
- Re: Not Enough Data
- From: Paul Crowley
- Re: Not Enough Data
- From: Gerrit Hanenburg
- Re: Not Enough Data
- From: Paul Crowley
- Re: Not Enough Data
- From: Gerrit Hanenburg
- Re: Not Enough Data
- Prev by Date: Re: Explain 'Little Lucy's deposition?
- Next by Date: Re: Not Enough Data
- Previous by thread: Re: Not Enough Data
- Next by thread: Re: Not Enough Data
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|