Re: Not Enough Data
- From: "mclark" <mclark13@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 29 Oct 2006 04:57:12 -0800
Jim McGinn wrote:
MClark wrote:
\
Nah. This is a perfect example of letting the data lead you by the
nose. Agriculture probably stretches back hundreds of thousand if not
millions of years.
Jesu Maria! Here's a good one:
"Agriculture probably stretches back hundreds of thousand if not
millions of years. " Dimmy (aka Claudius) 10/22/2006
Let me guess. Mikey objects because he saw in a textbook something
that said otherwise. And the textbook said otherwise based not on
evidence but on lack of evidence.
Lordy, lordy! I just about missed this one (there are so many):
"Science that basis [sic] conclusions on lack of evidence
are [sic] not scientific." Dimmy (aka Claudius) 10/22/2006
If you're playing along, please note that to be a decent .sig,
the statement must be *dripping* with irony, the author identified,
and the date must be included.
.
- References:
- Not Enough Data
- From: Jim McGinn
- Re: Not Enough Data
- From: Paul Crowley
- Re: Not Enough Data
- From: Jim McGinn
- Re: Not Enough Data
- From: MClark
- Re: Not Enough Data
- From: Jim McGinn
- Not Enough Data
- Prev by Date: Re: New Recipe: How to Make a Mass Extinction
- Next by Date: Re: When Burial Begins
- Previous by thread: Re: Not Enough Data
- Next by thread: When DID agriculture start?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
