Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
- From: claudiusdenk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 6 Dec 2006 08:41:30 -0800
pete wrote:
claudiusdenk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Lee Olsen wrote:
Jim McGinn wrote:
Claudius Denk:
This means that all through the stone age hominids were
strictly limited to treed habitat.
You were flamed because your statements were argumentative and
irrelvant to the point under discussion. You tried to dismiss the
existence of large feline predators in the earliest years of hominid
evolution based on an irrelevant observation.
Are there any species that lions eat,
that don't live where lions live?
Your question seems too vague to consider. What's your point?
Let's keep it simple. Yes or no, IYO, did lion sized (or bigger)
predators exist in the earliest (late miocene) years of hominid
evolution? It's a simple question, Pete. Why not give us a simple
answer (you evasive twit)? As you can see, Lee is bending over
backwards to avoid this question. Will you do the same? (My guess is
you will.)
--
pete
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
- From: pete
- Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
- From: Lee Olsen
- Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
- References:
- Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
- From: Jim McGinn
- Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
- From: Lee Olsen
- Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
- From: Jim McGinn
- Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
- From: Lee Olsen
- Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
- From: claudiusdenk
- Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
- From: Lee Olsen
- Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
- From: claudiusdenk
- Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
- From: Lee Olsen
- Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
- From: claudiusdenk
- Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
- From: Lee Olsen
- Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
- From: claudiusdenk
- Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
- From: Lee Olsen
- Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
- From: Jim McGinn
- Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
- From: Lee Olsen
- Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
- From: claudiusdenk
- Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
- From: pete
- Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
- Prev by Date: Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
- Next by Date: Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
- Previous by thread: Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
- Next by thread: Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading