Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence

claudiusdenk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
[...]
This means that the stone tools found in association with homo serve
agricultural ends--keeping food-competitor species out of their
gardens--and not the hunting/scavenging lifestyle that has become
popularized. And the stone tool cut marks found on bones associate
with Homo fossils are the result of ambush hunting in the context of
their garden-like communal territory.

Gona site. 2.6 mya. Stone tools in association with cut marked bones.

[...]
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
    ... This means that the stone tools found in association with homo serve ... gardens--and not the hunting/scavenging lifestyle that has become ... Stone tools in association with cut marked bones. ... ramidus bones were found with the Gona site. ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
    ... This means that the stone tools found in association with homo serve ... gardens--and not the hunting/scavenging lifestyle that has become ... Gona site. ... Stone tools in association with cut marked bones. ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
    ... This means that the stone tools found in association with homo serve ... Gona site. ... Stone tools in association with cut marked bones. ... At 2.6 mya the hominid involved here would have been an australopith of some kind. ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)