Re: Some people never learn (was re: Fun on PalAnth-L.)
- From: claudiusdenk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 11 Dec 2006 08:13:47 -0800
Rich Travsky wrote:
Negative arguments? I didn't know arguments can be positive or
negative. Where'd you get this BS?
http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/courses/argstages.htm
Stages of Argument
...
Let us say that a positive argument directly supports a conclusion, while a negative
argument undermines an opposing conclusion.
Hmm. Strange definition. Does everybody else stand by this
definition? Gerrit? (We all know he's afraid to answer.) Lee? All the
rest of your whackos?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Some people never learn (was re: Fun on PalAnth-L.)
- From: Lee Olsen
- Re: Some people never learn (was re: Fun on PalAnth-L.)
- References:
- Some people never learn (was re: Fun on PalAnth-L.)
- From: Lee Olsen
- Re: Some people never learn (was re: Fun on PalAnth-L.)
- From: claudiusdenk
- Re: Some people never learn (was re: Fun on PalAnth-L.)
- From: Rich Travsky
- Some people never learn (was re: Fun on PalAnth-L.)
- Prev by Date: Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
- Next by Date: Lactose Tolerance in East Africa Points to Recent Evolution
- Previous by thread: Re: Some people never learn (was re: Fun on PalAnth-L.)
- Next by thread: Re: Some people never learn (was re: Fun on PalAnth-L.)
- Index(es):