Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
- From: "Lee Olsen" <paleocity@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 12 Dec 2006 07:44:49 -0800
Jim McGinn wrote:
Lee Olsen wrote:
. . . where are all these weapons?
Learn to use a search engine.
Specifically starting at 2.5 mya. Me specific, do you mean rocks?
Starting about 8 or 8.1 mya. See my post entitled Economic Competition
of A'pith . . .
Rocks? Yes or no?
I
wouldn't disagree with that, because rocks are all a hominid needs to
drive predators off of kills.
Incidental Anecdotal. Dimwitted. It explains too little.
It explains all one needs to know if you want to drive most predators
off kills.
McGinn: "stone weapons (spears, bow and arrow) serve that show up in
the fossil record starting about 2.5 mya?"
What weapons showed up at 2.5 MYA? Be specific.
Do you dispute it. No. Then why should I bother?
Negative argument. How can I dispute it when you can't even tell me
specifically what weapons you are talking about? You evasive twit.
So now you admit some weapons show up.
So you can't name any weapons? But what you can do is make accusations,
you evasive twit.
You seem to not know what you
think from one minute to the next.
Still waiting for a list of weapons from you.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
- From: claudiusdenk
- Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
- References:
- Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
- From: Jim McGinn
- Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
- From: Lee Olsen
- Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
- From: Jim McGinn
- Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
- From: Lee Olsen
- Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
- From: claudiusdenk
- Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
- From: Lee Olsen
- Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
- From: Jim McGinn
- Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
- From: Lee Olsen
- Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
- From: Jim McGinn
- Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
- From: Lee Olsen
- Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
- From: Jim McGinn
- Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
- From: Lee Olsen
- Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
- From: claudiusdenk
- Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
- From: Lee Olsen
- Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
- From: Jim McGinn
- Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
- Prev by Date: Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
- Next by Date: Re: 70,000 year old snake god statue/carving found in Botswana
- Previous by thread: Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
- Next by thread: Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|