Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence


Lee Olsen wrote:
claudiusdenk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Lee Olsen wrote:


There's no such thing as negative evidence.

Circular answer, repeating your ignorance does not make it true.

However, a nice citation stating "There's no such thing" from a
peer-reviewed paper would certainly back up your claim :-)

The phrase you are (or should be) looking for is absence of evidence,
not negative evidence. Evidence doesn't come with positive or negative
signs.






BTW, you base your assumption that Homo Erectus regularly occupied
treeless habitat on zero evidence. Like I said previously, there is no
evidence that the stone tools associated with HE were laid down in
treeless habitat. None. Zero. Zilch. You might as well get used to
it. Nothing your gonna say will change this.

Says the retard who just claimed "There is no such thing as negative
evidence..."

There isn't.

You have been refuted retard.



Caldarao is such a polished gentleman. What a guy to actually imply you
had something "worthy of developement." If fact, Su called your rag a
"manifesto" which I also thought was more than kind.

Why not quote the whole conversations between myself and these two
idiots. I've got nothing to hide. How about you?

Why, you have proven time and time again you have not read the
liteature.

As you are demonstrating, any idiot can throw accusations. I've got

"saber-tooth lions" and you are right, you did retract this. But that
isn't the problem, it's how you tried to lie your way out of the corner
you painted yourself into, rather than cite a source, you gave us more
lip service.

You don't have anything substantive you wish to discuss? Why don't you
tell us how your hypothesis addresses the selective origins of hominid
linguistic abilities?



nothing to hide. Why not refer directly to me words? What are you
afraid of?

It has already been directly quoted, are you such a retard you need
everything repeated 5 times?

"Saber-tooth lions"
"There is no such thing as negative evidence retard."
"IOW, it makes about as much sense to emplace human ancestors,
including homo, neanderdudes, and even early humans (before the advent
of jeeps and guns) in treeless savanna habitat..."
"Homo rarely if ever left treed habitat."
"bows and arrows" at 2.5 mya.

This is just the start of your ignorant statement list.

Do you ever have a point?

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
    ... Think carefully about the evidence that will ... What about negative evidence? ... You have been refuted, retard. ... "IOW, it makes about as much sense to emplace human ancestors, ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
    ... There's no such thing as negative evidence. ... No citation, now how could I ever have guessed that? ... You have been refuted retard. ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
    ... Think carefully about the evidence that will ... What about negative evidence? ... You have been refuted, retard. ... you have proven time and time again you have not read the ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: A menace?
    ... More ignorance about wind turbines from Angus. ... so that birds are not at risk. ... So come on Malcolm, Give us the evidence. ...
    (uk.environment.conservation)
  • Re: chinese food and illegal immigration
    ... That statement is in denial of evidence already noted. ... retard boy. ... and YOU'RE too stupid to grasp it. ... How would a mistake in one debate be relevant to a mistake ...
    (rec.gambling.poker)