Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence


Lee Olsen wrote:
claudiusdenk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Lee Olsen wrote:

There is no such thing as negative evidence retard.

Having an especially bad day aren't you? Did you wake up this morning?
If you did, your posts certainly don't reflect it

http://www.dartmouth.edu/~hist12/writing.html
3. Begin to frame your thesis. Consider why you have phrased your
thesis the way you have. Think carefully about the evidence that will
support your thesis. What about negative evidence? Do not simply ignore
material that contradicts your thesis. Think about why you were not
convinced by negative arguments or evidence. How can you discount them?
Do you need to modify your argument to account for some of the negative
evidence? (Be careful though, you do not want a wishy-washy argument.)

Lee, you should have read this before you posted it. Your connotation
of the phrase, negative evidence, is different than the connotation in
your sample here. Read it again.

McGinn: "There is no such thing as negative evidence retard."
You have been refuted, retard.

There's no such thing as negative evidence.




BTW, you base your assumption that Homo Erectus regularly occupied
treeless habitat on zero evidence. Like I said previously, there is no
evidence that the stone tools associated with HE were laid down in
treeless habitat. None. Zero. Zilch. You might as well get used to
it. Nothing your gonna say will change this.

Says the retard who just claimed "There is no such thing as negative
evidence..."

There isn't.

You have been refuted retard.



Caldarao is such a polished gentleman. What a guy to actually imply you
had something "worthy of developement." If fact, Su called your rag a
"manifesto" which I also thought was more than kind.

Why not quote the whole conversations between myself and these two
idiots. I've got nothing to hide. How about you?

Why, you have proven time and time again you have not read the
liteature.

As you are demonstrating, any idiot can throw accusations. I've got
nothing to hide. Why not refer directly to me words? What are you
afraid of?

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
    ... Think carefully about the evidence that will ... What about negative evidence? ... You have been refuted, retard. ... "IOW, it makes about as much sense to emplace human ancestors, ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
    ... There's no such thing as negative evidence. ... No citation, now how could I ever have guessed that? ... You have been refuted retard. ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
    ... There's no such thing as negative evidence. ... repeating your ignorance does not make it true. ... You have been refuted retard. ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: chinese food and illegal immigration
    ... That statement is in denial of evidence already noted. ... retard boy. ... and YOU'RE too stupid to grasp it. ... How would a mistake in one debate be relevant to a mistake ...
    (rec.gambling.poker)
  • Re: Torture - A lawful good act?
    ... and cops are genetically ... single bit of evidence or relevant testimony was false. ... You might as well admit you're a retard. ... The evidence shown to the jury was plainly tainted by perjury. ...
    (rec.games.frp.dnd)