Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
- From: claudiusdenk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 14 Dec 2006 17:40:34 -0800
Lee Olsen wrote:
Caldararo is a professor and you are a grade-school student.
Caldararo is an idiot. Any idiot can get a degree in anthropology.
References?
Like yourself and the rest of the whackos on this NG, he doesn't know
what he thinks, doesn't know why he thinks it, but he is sure he is
right.
Lip service, the only argument you have any talent for.
Keep in mind that nobody knows who Nicollo Caldararo is. Did you know
that he never published anything on the subject of the earliest years
of hominid evolution? You've been quoting an expert that cannot claim
any expertise, at all. Other than desperation is there any reason you
are quoting him?
<snip>
I agree. They'd have stayed in treed habitat as a result (where they
have a tactical advantage).
Except the stone tools are out in the open areas.
Evidence?
<snip>
Since I was clearly talking about Homo and said so ("Homo climbs..").
Did Homo have gardens also?
Of course.
<snip>
I never mentioned acacia trees.
I did, because that is the most popular tree out on the acacia savanna.
You had 50-100 yds between trees or at least you said apiths never got
any further away from them than that.
What exactly is the kind of treed area that you think they lived?
Many different kinds. Certainly not accacia. Or, at least, not that
often. Not enough protection. No fruit (I think).
<snip>
So, Lee, why don't you tell us about your hypothesis on the earliest
years of hominid evolution? Is it a secret?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
- From: Lee Olsen
- Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
- References:
- Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
- From: claudiusdenk
- Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
- From: Jim McGinn
- Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
- From: Lee Olsen
- Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
- From: claudiusdenk
- Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
- From: Lee Olsen
- Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
- From: claudiusdenk
- Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
- From: Lee Olsen
- Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
- From: claudiusdenk
- Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
- From: Lee Olsen
- Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
- From: claudiusdenk
- Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
- From: Lee Olsen
- Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
- From: claudiusdenk
- Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
- From: Lee Olsen
- Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
- From: claudiusdenk
- Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
- From: Lee Olsen
- Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
- Prev by Date: Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
- Next by Date: Re: lions & savannah
- Previous by thread: Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
- Next by thread: Re: A More Reasonable Interpretation of the Evidence
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|