Re: Negative Evidence: 50 million Google hits can't be wrong
- From: claudiusdenk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 16 Dec 2006 11:05:22 -0800
Lee Olsen wrote:
claudiusdenk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
the loon who's garden hypothesis has been falsified....
<snip>
And the same guy that was in denial and tried to lie his way though his
"saber-tooth lion" evidence. Is this guy really too stupid to use
Google? Yes, apparently he is.
So, you admit that you refuse to define it? (Not that I'm under the
slightest illusion that Lee will ever answer this question. Whackos
never do.)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Negative Evidence: 50 million Google hits can't be wrong
- From: Lee Olsen
- Re: Negative Evidence: 50 million Google hits can't be wrong
- References:
- Negative Evidence: Lee's version of vagueness
- From: claudiusdenk
- Re: Negative Evidence: 50 million Google hits can't be wrong
- From: Lee Olsen
- Negative Evidence: Lee's version of vagueness
- Prev by Date: Re: Some people never learn (was re: Fun on PalAnth-L.)
- Next by Date: Re: Some people never learn (was re: Fun on PalAnth-L.)
- Previous by thread: Re: Negative Evidence: 50 million Google hits can't be wrong
- Next by thread: Re: Negative Evidence: 50 million Google hits can't be wrong
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
