"why not move on 4 legs" Re: We were never knuckle draggers
- From: Rich Travsky <traRvEsky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 22:22:20 -0600
Marc Verhaegen wrote:
Yes, that's obvious: knuckle-walking is more derived than bipedalism: in
order to evolve from palm-walking (all primates incL.human infants, except
chimps & gorillas) to knuckle-walking (walking on the dorsal instead of on
the ventral side of the hand), chimps & gorillas needed an intermediary
phase where their hands were +-not used for pronograde locomotion. This
intermediary phase was not arm-hanging (alone): otherwise gibbons & orangs
would knuckle-walk on the ground, but they're palm-walkers. All apes still
walk regularly or occasionally on 2 legs, so the intermediary phase was
(short-legged) bipedalism (probably in combination with climbing arms
overhead).
Marc's explanation of how an obligate biped becomes a quadruped:
"why not move on 4 legs"
Op 03-06-2007 00:50, in artikel.
QI2dnVhn2OGsafzbnZ2dnUVZ_o2vnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx, MClark <men@xxxxxxxx> schreef:
/Upright walking may not have been uniquely human/
Ann Mcllroy, Toronto Globe and Mail
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: "why not move on 4 legs" Re: We were never knuckle draggers
- From: Marc Verhaegen
- Re: "why not move on 4 legs" Re: We were never knuckle draggers
- References:
- We were never knuckle draggers
- From: MClark
- Re: We were never knuckle draggers
- From: Marc Verhaegen
- We were never knuckle draggers
- Prev by Date: Re: human ancestors never passed through a knuckle-walking phase
- Next by Date: Re: A.afr.-rob.// A.afar.-boisei
- Previous by thread: Re: We were never knuckle draggers
- Next by thread: Re: "why not move on 4 legs" Re: We were never knuckle draggers
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading