Re: Bipedal P & G
- From: Marc Verhaegen <m_verhaegen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2007 08:33:44 +0200
Op 07-07-2007 07:43, in artikel 468F27FC.F3E4E427@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Rich
Travsky <traRvEsky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> schreef:
Marc Verhaegen wrote:
http://www2.biologie.fu-berlin.de/humanbio/publhof1.htm
But they're not obligate bipeds.
Don't be silly:
1) obligate biped??
- Lucy had curved phalanges = branch-hanging.
- It had a few KWing features.
2) exclusion?? why??
Obviously, Lucy was a bipedal wader-climber (arms overhead) in swamp forests
(where it was found), feeding partly on AHV, sedges etc.(cf.microwear,
calorie-poor diet, thick enamel, smaller front teeth, larger backteeth),
like lowland gorillas, but afarensis spent more time in the water & less on
the forest floor (cf.hotter+wetter Pliocene).
Why not inform a bit, eg, my 2002 paper with P-F.Puech & S.Munro
"Aquarboreal ancestors?" Trends in Ecology & Evolution 17:212-7. Just
google "aquarboreal". :-)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bipedal P & G
- From: Rich Travsky
- Re: Bipedal P & G
- From: Lee Olsen
- Re: Bipedal P & G
- References:
- Re: Bipedal P & G
- From: Rich Travsky
- Re: Bipedal P & G
- Prev by Date: Re: Marc was right?
- Next by Date: Re: Laetoli footprints
- Previous by thread: Re: Bipedal P & G
- Next by thread: Re: Bipedal P & G
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading