Re: Bipedal P & G




Op 08-07-2007 14:03, in artikel
1183896198.950171.213330@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Lee Olsen
<paleocity@xxxxxxxxxxx> schreef:

On Jul 7, 11:19 pm, Marc Verhaegen <m_verhae...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Op 08-07-2007 01:32, in artikel
1183851175.520444.139...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Lee Olsen
<paleoc...@xxxxxxxxxxx> schreef:





On Jul 7, 3:35 pm, Marc Verhaegen <m_verhae...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Op 07-07-2007 17:35, in artikel
1183822556.516813.114...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Lee Olsen
<paleoc...@xxxxxxxxxxx> schreef:

On Jul 7, 8:15 am, Marc Verhaegen <m_verhae...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Op 07-07-2007 14:48, in artikel
1183812481.442630.245...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Lee Olsen
<paleoc...@xxxxxxxxxxx> schreef:

On Jul 6, 11:33 pm, Marc Verhaegen <m_verhae...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Why not inform a bit, eg, my 2002 paper with P-F.Puech & S.Munro
"Aquarboreal ancestors?" Trends in Ecology & Evolution 17:212-7. Just
google "aquarboreal". :-)

:-)

Yes, if you want endless question marks and silly information on how
mountain beavers are semi-aquatic animals, by all means see TREE 2002.

Said the SF whose ancestors ran after antelopes.

The savanna freaks have the hard evidence....cut marks on antelope
bones = savanna living niche.

Yes, on riverbanks, forgot??

Funny you can't cite this....you made it up. Getting pretty desperate
aren't you?

??

You made the claim, you prove it. The only thing you have proven so far is
you have a vivid imagination: savanna runners after antelopes... :-D

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Bipedal P & G
    ... by all means see TREE 2002. ... bones = savanna living niche. ... acquired meat and mar- ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: Bipedal P & G
    ... by all means see TREE 2002. ... bones = savanna living niche. ... Yes, on riverbanks, forgot?? ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: Bipedal P & G
    ... mountain beavers are semi-aquatic animals, by all means see TREE 2002. ... bones = savanna living niche. ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)